tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10408947.post115676619383268054..comments2023-11-04T11:35:29.510-07:00Comments on Everything Under The Sun!: Will students really stop reading about 'Pluto'?Anjana Ramamoorthyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05169202358881160809noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10408947.post-1157559289833238602006-09-06T09:14:00.000-07:002006-09-06T09:14:00.000-07:00oh, then there is some bug in nava graha concept :...oh, then there is some bug in nava graha concept :-), or the definition of graha itself is bit hazzy that time..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10408947.post-1157214658967739002006-09-02T09:30:00.000-07:002006-09-02T09:30:00.000-07:00@sudhakar,Navagrahas of Indian Astrology -> sun...@sudhakar,<BR/>Navagrahas of Indian Astrology -> <BR/> sun, moon, <BR/> mercury, venus,<BR/> mars, jupiter, saturn,<BR/> rahu, ketu (shadows that fall on moon !)<BR/><BR/>uranus, neptune and pluto are nowhere in the picture....guess this is coz they are never visible to naked eye while the others are... <BR/>earth is also not included in this list....coolkrishnanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16775117636189113184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10408947.post-1157181114292550402006-09-02T00:11:00.000-07:002006-09-02T00:11:00.000-07:00I feel, the decision on pluto it more like correct...I feel, the decision on pluto it more like correcting a mistake which is very similiar to Y2K problem. What these idiots are doing since 1930 ? are they not so mature to decide on a planet for all these years? <BR/><BR/>Now, when you look at pluto...its very much a planet even now and has 2 moons and an exclusive orbit too. Be it wrong or not, the vedic times have concluded on the nava graha concepts long back. But the only difference is in vedic times, they have counted surya and chandra also as planets which is not aligned with modern sciences.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10408947.post-1156842632150239362006-08-29T02:10:00.000-07:002006-08-29T02:10:00.000-07:00good one !The purpose of education is not mere acc...good one !<BR/><BR/>The purpose of education is not mere accumulation of knowledge in the brain, but to learn to think.<BR/><BR/>So teaching first that "earth is round " and then say "it is not exactly round, but slightly squeezed round" is acceptable :)<BR/><BR/>But the dalton thing is too much.....<BR/><BR/>again mugging up poetry is one of the hardest things I did in school..... never understood why one shud do that !coolkrishnanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16775117636189113184noreply@blogger.com